02-13-2021, 06:34 PM
I think the kinds of boys for whom systematic petticoating is warranted fall into three categories:
First, there are the boys who show signs of having strong sissyish tendencies. These might be boys who are quite timid, who might seem to have a preference for playing with girls, and so on. Finding some excuse for force boys like these to wear panties and dresses will help them feel, and properly accept, their essential sissy nature. Basically, a mother or aunt or grandmother who petticoats this kind of boy is communicating the message to the boy that it is not only OK to be girlish, but it is actually what the women in his life prefer for him. Even boys like this are likely to complain and protest and perhaps even beg not to be forced to wear panties, but that phase is likely to pass fairly quickly as the boy feels how pleasant it is to be made to look girlishly pretty. That, of course, is the reason why the strategy that some parents of sissyish boys use of punishing the boy by making him dress completely as a girl "as a way of teaching him to be less girlish" is bound to fail as a way of making the boy less girlish. Instead, the more that sissyish boys experience looking and being treated as a girl, the more they will realize that being girlish is what they really want to be.
Second are boys who are difficult and disobedient and who are in need of the strong controlling influence of a dominant woman. My sense is that with these kinds of boys, it is often at the point when the mother is at her wit's end and unable to cope that another woman in the family, either an aunt or grandmother, is turned to for assistance and it is then that other woman who subjects the boy to a regimen of petticoat discipline. Of course, some other forms of punishment, such as spankings and mouth soapings may be required to bring the boy to the point of compliance with the petticoating, although for those opposed to any forms of corporal punishment, withholding food or bathroom privileges can be quite effective as well. In any case, these kinds of boys are likely to experience deep and intense feelings of shame and humiliation when they are first put into panties and dresses, and woman I've talked with have reported that the boys like this that they've petticoated typically break down in tears that they can't control, not just the first time they are petticoated, but on multiple subsequent petticoating sessions as well. But what then seems to surprise many women in these situations is that, if a regimen of petticoating is maintained for any length of time, even these kinds of boys become placid and compliant and accepting of the treatment and become much more girlish in their feelings and behaviors. A good, and common, sign is when such a boy switches, when complimented on how pretty he looks when petticoated, from first complaining that he's not pretty but instead that he's "a boy" to eventually blushing and showing evidence of feeling good about the compliment. The more often a boy like this is taken out in public while petticoated, the quickly this kind of transition in his feelings is likely to occur.
The third category of boys who benefit from being petticoated and who should be petticoated is -- all other boys. Or at least, that is my view about the proper way for all boys to now be raised.
First, there are the boys who show signs of having strong sissyish tendencies. These might be boys who are quite timid, who might seem to have a preference for playing with girls, and so on. Finding some excuse for force boys like these to wear panties and dresses will help them feel, and properly accept, their essential sissy nature. Basically, a mother or aunt or grandmother who petticoats this kind of boy is communicating the message to the boy that it is not only OK to be girlish, but it is actually what the women in his life prefer for him. Even boys like this are likely to complain and protest and perhaps even beg not to be forced to wear panties, but that phase is likely to pass fairly quickly as the boy feels how pleasant it is to be made to look girlishly pretty. That, of course, is the reason why the strategy that some parents of sissyish boys use of punishing the boy by making him dress completely as a girl "as a way of teaching him to be less girlish" is bound to fail as a way of making the boy less girlish. Instead, the more that sissyish boys experience looking and being treated as a girl, the more they will realize that being girlish is what they really want to be.
Second are boys who are difficult and disobedient and who are in need of the strong controlling influence of a dominant woman. My sense is that with these kinds of boys, it is often at the point when the mother is at her wit's end and unable to cope that another woman in the family, either an aunt or grandmother, is turned to for assistance and it is then that other woman who subjects the boy to a regimen of petticoat discipline. Of course, some other forms of punishment, such as spankings and mouth soapings may be required to bring the boy to the point of compliance with the petticoating, although for those opposed to any forms of corporal punishment, withholding food or bathroom privileges can be quite effective as well. In any case, these kinds of boys are likely to experience deep and intense feelings of shame and humiliation when they are first put into panties and dresses, and woman I've talked with have reported that the boys like this that they've petticoated typically break down in tears that they can't control, not just the first time they are petticoated, but on multiple subsequent petticoating sessions as well. But what then seems to surprise many women in these situations is that, if a regimen of petticoating is maintained for any length of time, even these kinds of boys become placid and compliant and accepting of the treatment and become much more girlish in their feelings and behaviors. A good, and common, sign is when such a boy switches, when complimented on how pretty he looks when petticoated, from first complaining that he's not pretty but instead that he's "a boy" to eventually blushing and showing evidence of feeling good about the compliment. The more often a boy like this is taken out in public while petticoated, the quickly this kind of transition in his feelings is likely to occur.
The third category of boys who benefit from being petticoated and who should be petticoated is -- all other boys. Or at least, that is my view about the proper way for all boys to now be raised.
 
